Lecture by Willow Verkerk: Gendered Mimesis and the Episteme of Sex
- https://www.gender.hu-berlin.de/de/veranstaltungen/archiv/events/220607_willow_verkerk_gendered_mimesis_and_the_episteme_of_sex
- Lecture by Willow Verkerk: Gendered Mimesis and the Episteme of Sex
- 2022-06-07T16:00:00+02:00
- 2022-06-07T18:00:00+02:00
- Gender Lecture
- Wann 07.06.2022 von 16:00 bis 18:00
- Wo Institute of Social Sciences (Universitätsstrasse 3b), room 005
- Name des Kontakts Liesbeth Schoonheim
- Web Externe Webseite besuchen
- iCal
Veranstaltet von
Institut für Sozialwissenschaften der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Theorie der Politik
Kurzbeschreibung
The research group in Political Theory is hosting a guest lecture by Willow Verkerk (University of British Columbia (Canada)/KU Leuven (Belgium).
This lecture is concerned with how ‘sex’ as a biological category is mimetically formed by historically and culturally constructed notions of gender, including what Sara Ahmed calls “gender fatalism.” In Gender Trouble, Judith Butler criticizes the expressive model of sex, gender, and desire which assumes a linear relationship in which gender and desire express sex. They propose that the binary category of sex can be better understood as constructed and not innate. The concept of ‘sex’ too has a genealogy and like ‘gender’ it has been formed through discursive and cultural networks of power that bind it to heteronormativity and repronormativity. In Living a Feminist Life, Ahmed outlines how not only gender but also sex becomes “a homework”: when it is “assigned” at birth it points to an expectant future. As Ahmed indicates the statements, “boys will be boys” and “girls will be girls,” are exemplary of the kinds of gender discourses that reify binary concepts of sex difference in which being a coherent sex is dependent upon representing a ‘correct’ gender. The notion that sex is primary and gender follows as a representation of sex is questioned by Butler and Ahmed. Instead, it is suggested by them that this imitative relationship also moves in the opposite direction, so that sex imitates gender too. I agree with Butler and Ahmed that it is important to reject the one-sided expressive view. However, I also claim that to sufficiently understand the relation between sex and gender, we require a notion of gendered mimesis as an immanent and affective force which can act to dispossess the episteme of sex of truth claims that resist the gender binary. Thus, the philosophical concepts of sex and gender are not only structured by a relationship of imitation, they are also regulated and modified by a mimetic pathos which has historically acted to divest ‘sex’ from attributes that do not cohere with repro- and hetero- normative values.
Referent*innen
Willow Verkerk (University of British Columbia (Canada)/KU Leuven (Belgium)
Weitere Informationen
Semester: Sommersemester 2022
ZtG-Veranstaltungskategorie: Gender-Veranstaltungen der Institute/Fakultäten der HU